|
Wednesday, March 18, 2015
Snow Days and Compliance FMLA Changes
Friday, June 28, 2013
Supreme Court Hands Employers a Victory in Title VII Case
The United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 verdict on June
24, 2013 clarifying that an employee alleging unlawful retaliation in violation
of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 must be able to prove that a
retaliatory motive was the “but-for” cause of an adverse employment action.
This decision ensures that the burden of proof is never on
the employer. Now, the employee must be able to prove that the impermissible,
retaliatory motive was the main reason and not simply a reason for the
employer’s averse action. By this standard, employees pushing the allegations
must be able to prove that “the unlawful retaliation would not have occurred in
the absence of the alleged wrongful action or actions of the employer.”
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Seven Ways for More Effective Communications with Your Employees
A company’s employees are always one of the most valuable
resource they can have. Employees like to feel kept in the loop and know what
is going on in and with the company they represent. Yet, all too often, in an
effort to provide the best customer relations, companies push communicating
with their employees to the back burner. This can lead to lower employee morale
and eventually then decreasing employee productivity.
However, there are seven simple steps that every company can
begin to put in place to avoid this problem.
1) Personalize company goals with each individual
employee and departments’ priorities and goals. When mistakes occur or a
project ventures off course, ask yourself “what context or information did I
not provide my team with adequately?”
2) Employees want to know how they fit into the
overall corporate equation. They desire to know their job has meaning and is
needed in the company structure. Communicate with your employees how their
position helps enhance the company standing, completes the workload, etc.
3) In numerous studies, the boss is always the
preferred source for information related to an employee’s job. Be ready with
essential information to help employees perform their job more effectively.
4) Performance feedback is always appreciated by
employees. It is better to provide a more real time stream of feedback in
addition to the more formal annual reviews. This allows you the ability to
reinforce good behavior/activities and correct misguided ones closer to the
actual action.
5) Try to look at what an employee wants and/or
needs from their point of view. Employees want to feel their boss can empathize
with them.
6) Conduct various things such as engagement
surveys, listening sessions, etc. to hear how the company and procedures are
from the employee’s point of view. Enlisting the help of a third party to
conduct these reviews helps employees feel more comfortable to open us and
provide constructively honest answers.
7) Be consistent and reliable with when you
communicate with your employees. Establish a plan for employee communications
and then inform all of your employees of when they can expect to hear
information from you.
For more information or help setting up an employee
communication plan, call your Lowden & Associates team member at
770.248.0401.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Seven Ways to Increase Productivity and Save Money by Giving Your Employees a Bigger Voice
There is a tremendously valuable think tank for every
business that most companies do not even turn to for free advice. So, where do
you need to go for quality ideas that can save your company money…your own
employees. Seeking and acting on employee ideas can save the employer money in
addition to building a sense of ownership among the workers.
Employee suggestions can have a significant impact on
business productivity, revenue and the overall effectiveness of the entire
organization. This group is on the front lines of customer relations, the
company processes and much more every day. They know first-hand where the inefficiencies
and delays are in the company. Below are the seven steps you can take to not
only increase employee engagement but save your company some serious money
while increasing productivity.
1) People Need to be Listened To. When
employees feel like they are not being listened to, there is psychological
affect that makes them withdraw. However, the opposite is true as well. When
employees see ideas are being used they are more willing to open up and share.
According to a Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) poll, on average
one-fifth of workers say their opinions count at work. If you increase that to
one-third, profitability also increases by 6%. Safety, customer satisfaction
and employee retention all rise, too.
2) Solicit Ideas from Engaged Employees.
Engaged employees have been found to provide more useful ideas. In fact, Gallup
conducted a survey that found ideas offered by less engaged workers saved a
company $4,000 on average versus the most engaged workers who saved the company
on average $11,000.
For more information on how to increase productivity by
giving employees a bigger voice, contact Lowden & Associates at
770.248.0401.
Steps to Assure a Smooth Performance Appraisal
Performance Appraisals are not always the easiest or the
highlight of being a manager. Most people are hesitant to conduct a thorough
review for fear of upsetting an employee.
Appraisals are most often used to determine salary
increases. However, the main reason for appraisals should be to determine and
improve the quality of an employee’s performance, set goals and plan for
personal and career growth. When this becomes the main focus it is easier to
have a more laid back appraisal since it shifts more towards coaching instead
of critiquing.
So, the question becomes what steps you as the manager need
to take to ensure a coaching session. Below will detail the prep and process of
performing a proper performance appraisal.
Before the Appraisal:
- Review the performance Appraisal Form and Format
- Using objective data, list all the points that
need to be discussed
- List the employee’s good points, as well as
areas for improvement
- Review the employee’s last performance appraisal
- Develop a series of questions and answers that
need to be asked about pervious goals
- Determine if the employee had any problems on
the job, look at the overall year
- Seek input from other supervisors who have worked
with the employee
- Discuss the appraisal with the next level of
supervision, as appropriate
- Set an appointment with the employee for a
specific time and day for the face-to-face appraisal
- Allow the employee at least a week to review the
materials to develop questions and comments
The Appraisal Process:
- Greet the employee by name
- Review in detail the written form with the
employee
- Give specific examples and be direct
If there are any disagreements between the supervisor and
the employee, allow the employee an opportunity to create a written rebuttal
that can be attached to the appraisal form before it becomes final. For more
information on how best to handle and conduct performance appraisals, contact
Lowden & Associates, Inc. at 770.248.0401.
Friday, March 29, 2013
New Form I-9 Released in March 2013
The United
States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released the new I-9
Employment Eligibility Verification Form this month. Employers are required to
start using the new form version immediately but the USCIS has given a 60 day
grace period until May 7, 2013. Please note, failure to properly complete and
retain the Form I-9s correctly can result in civil money penalties of up to
$1,000 per I-9 in violation and, in some cases, lead to criminal penalties.
Most of the
form changes are in format, additional fields and more instructions to
employers. To avoid any claims of discrimination, do not have current employees
complete the new Form I-9 if there is already a properly completed I-9 on file,
unless reverification applies.
To download
the new Form I-9, please click here. For more information on the new Form I-9,
please contact your Lowden & Associates partner at 770.248.0401.
Telecommuting Concerns…4 Areas of Possible Liability
The trend of
employees who are telecommuting is picking up even more steam. In 2009, 34
million employees telecommuted in the United States, at least part of the week.
Estimates are that by 2016, 63 million workers, or 43 percent of the US work
force, will telecommute. The benefits of allowing telecommuting are numerous
and wide ranging: increased productivity; increased job satisfaction; reduced
absenteeism; lower employee turnover; reductions in traditional fixed expenses
such as energy costs, office rental, and parking; improved customer service;
improved employee morale; and reduced employee stress and improved wellness.
However,
there are important legal and HR compliance concerns that every employer who
permits telecommuting should know about.
1) Wage-Hour Laws. You are still
responsible for staying in compliance with all state and federal overtime laws
for telecommuting employees. Establish a policy that clearly states what work
is permissible and when. Also, you could chose to automatically record, by
computer, the number of hours worked online each week.
2) Workplace Safety Laws. The Occupational
Safety and Health Act which makes employers responsible for workplace safety
applies to telecommuters, even those working from home. Employers may require
telecommuters to have a designated workplace inspected and approved by the
company.
3) Confidential Information. Employers
can require telecommuting employee to follow certain protocols with regards to
passwords and secure protected networks.
4) Texting While Driving. With mobile
smartphones, employees can work from their phones anytime, anywhere. Employers
should institute the appropriate policies and procedures in regards to
prohibiting texting while driving.
For more
information on policies for telecommuters, call your Lowden & Associates
partner at 770.248.0401.
Are You an Effective Leader During Times of Change?
A company’s
ability to change and adapt to new challenges is a key component of sustained
success, but change is not always easy. In fact, 70 percent of change
initiatives fail to deliver the intended outcomes. The prolonged effects of the
recession has impacted more than just people’s income, productivity and
employment figures. The workplace has become much more risk adverse.
One of the
most impacted groups is in company leadership. More executives seem to be
reaching the point of an overwhelming reluctance to be bold with change.
Instead, executives are increasingly crouching into a defensive position and
not leading the charge for change. This can cause employees to become cynical,
disengaged and unproductive. Eventually the top talent will flee for the exit
doors.
So, what are
some signs that executives are pulling back? Below is a list of the behaviors
these executives typically exhibit:
- A subconscious reaction to stress and anxiety
- The desire to avoid rocking the boat, dodging
risk or confrontational situations
- Going out of their way to prevent taking the
fall
- Micromanaging team members
- Holding a tight control over communications
- Intentionally not listening or dismissing
unwanted and/or challenging feedback
Leading
through changes is all about increasing employee dedication and commitment to a
new vision while minimizing devotion to the status quo. The leaders who are
effective during change mobilize employee energy to create action plans for the
movement.
Below are
six ways for an executive to become a more effective change leader:
1) Allow for thinking to be challenged in order to
take a broader view
2) Evaluate opportunities to influence top leaders
to create alignments for intentions
3) Fight for the values of the change
4) Actively engage the team and address any
concerns of the employees
5) Create and sell a compelling change story
6) Have frequent recognition of quality
performances
For more
information, contact a Lowden & Associates partner at 770.248.0401.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Could Culture Be Affecting Your Hiring?
Hiring mistakes can lead to costly and negative ramifications, and is all too common in companies today. In fact, 69 percent of companies said they had been negatively affected by a bad hire in 2012 alone, according to a recent Career Builder survey. More than 40 percent of US employers estimated a bad hiring decision cost them $25,000 last year, while 25 percent estimated the cost to be more than $50,000.
A poor hiring decision can show up in many ways such as less productivity, lower employee morale/engagement, cost in training new employees, etc.
But why do companies keep making poor hiring decisions? One big reason might be cultural. It is a human tendency to look for similarities in our hiring decisions. Most people like the ‘two peas in a pod’ feeling and actively seek that out.
As a consequence, we do not always find the most skilled candidate for the position. Usually, applicants get screened for qualifications in the very early stages of the recruiting process and then the focus shifts from skills to personality. In fact, cultural fit is a part of the formal recruitment process in most cases, even when searching for diversity.
Building a team of cultural similarities can usually create a strong cohesive unit but you may be denying yourself the talent level that the company needs to be truly successful.Like anything in life, there is a balance that needs to be struck between cultural fit and talent level. For more information, call 770.248.0401.
A poor hiring decision can show up in many ways such as less productivity, lower employee morale/engagement, cost in training new employees, etc.
But why do companies keep making poor hiring decisions? One big reason might be cultural. It is a human tendency to look for similarities in our hiring decisions. Most people like the ‘two peas in a pod’ feeling and actively seek that out.
As a consequence, we do not always find the most skilled candidate for the position. Usually, applicants get screened for qualifications in the very early stages of the recruiting process and then the focus shifts from skills to personality. In fact, cultural fit is a part of the formal recruitment process in most cases, even when searching for diversity.
Building a team of cultural similarities can usually create a strong cohesive unit but you may be denying yourself the talent level that the company needs to be truly successful.Like anything in life, there is a balance that needs to be struck between cultural fit and talent level. For more information, call 770.248.0401.
Providing Flexible Work Arrangements to Your Employees
Four Steps to Ensure Your Flex-Time Program Works
More and more companies are offering as employees are asking for flexible work arrangements and hours. This trend has increased dramatically throughout the Great Recession. Now, 77 percent of companies say they permit and/or encourage flextime, up from 66 percent in 2005, according to the 2012 National Study of Employers by the Society for Human Resource Management and the nonprofit Families and Work Institute.
Almost 67 percent of those surveyed said they permit employees to work from home on occasion, bringing a 34 percent increase in the past seven years. The practice of overtime has shifted as well. Employers surveyed, 44 percent, said they now give employees a choice as to whether they work overtime hours or not. This has led to it becoming more acceptable for employees to turn down overtimes.
With the new flexible work arrangements come some potential pitfalls that employers must be aware of and avoid. Below are four things to keep in mind as an employer looking at flexible work schedules:
Almost 67 percent of those surveyed said they permit employees to work from home on occasion, bringing a 34 percent increase in the past seven years. The practice of overtime has shifted as well. Employers surveyed, 44 percent, said they now give employees a choice as to whether they work overtime hours or not. This has led to it becoming more acceptable for employees to turn down overtimes.
With the new flexible work arrangements come some potential pitfalls that employers must be aware of and avoid. Below are four things to keep in mind as an employer looking at flexible work schedules:
- Follow the Established Rules. Our current wage-payment laws were put into effect years ago and were not designed with the new flex-time in mind. Be proactive and avoid unintentionally violations.
- Update Your Recordkeeping Process. In order to have a successful and compliant flex-time program, you will most likely need to update your current time tracking system. Make sure that your tracking system can provide you with precise and accurate time stamps. When establishing the new system, make sure that all of your supervisors and employees are properly trained. Then you will have to discipline any who violate the new rules.
- Overtime and Misclassifications. It is vitally important to keep track of all overtime hours worked, even for those employees who are on a flex-time schedule. The vast majority of litigation regarding flex-time is due to the employers classifying their employees in the wrong category of exempt or non-exempt. The basic rule to follow is all employees are to be presumed as non-exempt from overtime pay provisions of the FLSA, unless you can prove that a specific exemption applies directly to them.
- Test the Program First. Before jumping in with a new flex-time program, give it a dry test run first. Inform all employees about the test run and remind them if the program is not a success, you will return to the old way. After your test run, analyze what worked, what didn’t, employee and supervisor feedback, pros and cons, etc., then make any needed adjustments.
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Bring a Dog to Work Day
Want your office to go to
the dogs the way some industry titans like Google and Amazon have? It is estimated that roughly 1.4 million dog
owners bring about 2.3 million of their pets to work with them daily. Pet-friendly
work environments are becoming increasingly more popular and proving to have a
significant impact on companies’ bottom lines.
There are many rewards for
a company to become dog-friendly.
- WARM
FUZZIES:
o Improved Quality of Life for
Employees
o Increases Overall Office Morale
o Produces Team Bonding
o Relieves Stress
o Greater Employee Happiness and
Satisfaction
- Employees
who bring their dogs to work typically work longer hours, since they don’t have
to worry about getting home to their pets.
- Productivity
and Efficiency are greatly increased among employees who bring their dogs into
the office with them.
- Workplace
distinction that will separate you from your competition.
Moving towards a
dog-friendly workplace may not be embraced by all employees. Some people do not
like dogs, may have an allergy and/or are afraid of animals. It will be your
responsibility as the employer to accommodate these people, too. This could be
as simple as having a “dog-free” area of the office to installing a top of the
line filtration system to diminish the effects dander and pet hair.
If you are going to create
a dog-friendly workplace, there are a few things to keep in mind.
- Some
industries may be prevented from having dogs by state law and/or local
regulations.
- Make
sure that your building will allow dogs inside.
- Obtain
proper insurance to protect your company in case of injuries or damages.
- Create
workplace rules regarding dogs, put them in writing as part of your Employee
Handbook.
- Will
you require proof of recently vaccinations? Free of fleas? Pet training?
- Will
you permit all dogs in the office or those under a certain weight?
- Will
the dogs be allowed in every part of the office?
- Where
and how will dogs be kept if an employee needs to leave the office during the
day?
- How
will you deal with an aggressive dog?
- Create
rules regarding cleaning up after the dogs.
If you are interested in
becoming a dog-friendly workplace environment, start with a trial run. Invite
your employees to bring their dogs on a certain day every week for a set period
of time. See how it goes and affects your company. For more information, please
contact Lowden & Associates, Inc. at 770-248-0401.
OSHA Annual Summary Posting by February 1, 2013
ATTENTION: OSHA expanded
their scope and increased the amount of citations concerning the standards of
recordkeeping. Employers who maintain the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration’s 300 Logs for workplace injuries and illnesses must post their
2012 annual summary by February 1, 2013. Forms can be found on the OSHA
website.
All logs must be certified
by an approved company executive who is considered to be:
1)
Company
Owner
2)
An
Officer of the corporation
3)
The
highest-ranking company official working at the establishment
4)
The
immediate supervisor of the highest-ranking company official working at the
establishment.
The annual summary report
requires that employers include a calculation of the annual average number of
employees covered by the Log. Also required are the total hours worked by all
covered employees. The requirement allows employers to compare the frequency of
a significant occupational injury and illness at their workplace compared to
other companies.
OSHA Logs must be posted
for three consecutive months from February 1st to April 30th,
even at companies that have no recordable injuries or illnesses. Employers have
the responsibility to ensure that the posted annual summary is not altered, defaced
or obscured at all during the entire posting period.
In 2013, OSHA will stay
with a focus on recordkeeping in its National Emphasis Program (NEP) and
enforcement focus. Employers should take time to carefully review the forms for
technical errors and review all other materials to confirm all recordable
incidents have been included properly.
For more information,
contact Lowden & Associates, Inc. at 770-248-0401.
Court Strikes Down NLRB Due to Unconstitutional Appointees
The short-term fate of the
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is in real jeopardy as of Friday, January
25, 2013. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued a major blow
against the NLRB in Noel Canning v. NLRB.
Led by Chief Judge David
Santelle, the opinion was decided on purely constitutional grounds. They ruled
that President Barack Obama’s three ‘recess appointments’ of NLRB Board Members
in January of 2012 were not constitutionally permitted. The court ruled that
the appointments were made when the Senate was not in recess and for “vacancies
that did not ‘happen during the Recess of the Senate’ as required by Article II
of the Constitution.” In the decision, the court cited the decision from the
U.S. Supreme Court in the 2010 case New Process Steel v. NLRB, that
without a proper quorum “the order under review is void ab initio (from
the beginning).”
This case will most likely
end up in the U.S. Supreme Court and if they side with the Court of Appeals,
the judicial ruling could void every decision the NLRB has made since the last
proper quorum. As of now, things look rather desolate for this government
agency.
Board Chairman Mark Pearce
(a non-affected appointee) released a defiant statement after the court’s
decision vowing the board would “continue to perform our statutory duties and
issue decisions.” If the ruling stands, this would put the NLRB in an even
greater hole, creating even more cases that a future board will have to
re-decide.
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Five Steps to Cool Down Political Dustups in the Workplace
November 6, 2012 or
Election Day is just over a month away and with that comes an increase in the
workplace talk of politics. As everybody knows, politics can always generate
strong emotions from people. This seems especially true this year as the
partisan banter and divide is at an all time high.
Political Speech in the
workplace can present difficult challenges for employers that can create an
unproductive and divided workforce with lower morale. Also, strong political
debates can offend clients whom disagree and take offense.
The question then becomes
how can you tame down a politically charged conversation in the workplace
without violating a person’s First Amendment rights?
Private employers have an
easier time regulating political speech during working hours than their public
counterparts. This is because free speech in the workplace is different than
free speech outside. There are several laws that help break down the
differences and where the limitations lie, such as the First Amendment,
National Labor Relations Act, Election Laws, State and Municipal Laws, Civil
Rights Act, etc.
So, what is an employer to
do to protect themselves from the pitfalls of workplace political comments?
There are five steps you can start implementing today.
1) Education
is key to a lot of things, political speech is no exception. Start with
retraining all of your employees on the basic and relevant policies on
anti-harassment, anti-discrimination, equal employment opportunity, etc.
2) Encourage
accountability. Have employees help be your eyes and ears by reporting anything
they feel is politically harassing or violating, so you can take steps to cool
down political tensions.
3) Add
to your corporate code of conduct. Let employees know they need to be
respectful of their fellow co-workers political opinions and values; therefore
failure to do so could merit disciplinary action against them.
4) Cover
political apparel in your dress code. Political buttons, stickers and/or other
campaign paraphernalia can spark a heated debate, so consider putting a clause
addressing this in your dress code.
5) Do
not push your views. Feel free to encourage your employees to partake in their
civic duty to vote but be careful not to cross the line in convincing them to
vote or financially support a particular candidate and/or cause. The persuasion
could be viewed as a coercive activity by some and run in violation of federal
and state election laws.
Workplace political
dustups can be cooled down by being aware and following the five aforementioned
steps. For more information on how to reduce political distractions in your
office, contact Todd Weyandt at todd@laihr.com.
Friday, September 28, 2012
Incivility Rising…Don’t Allow It To Affect Your Bottom Line
Do you look forward to
going to work everyday because it is an engaging and friendly atmosphere? Or
are you like the 86% of employees surveyed in a Jeannie Trudel study that said
they had experienced some form of incivility in the workplace within the past
year.
Unfortunately, incivility
in the workplace is a more common problem than most people realize, and it is
rising. This growing epidemic is not contained in just one particular industry
or even just from a supervisor. The uptick in workplace incivility could be
attributable to the pressures employees are dealing with under a still lagging
economy.
Employees have more stress
on them to be productive while working longer and harder, in most cases.
Employers must be cognoscente of this issue to avoid it escalating into more
aggressive or even violent behavior. Workplace incivility can have a major
impact on the company from organizational commitment, job performance, turnover
and retention.
The truth is very few
employees will actually report workplace incivility to their respective HR
personnel and/or managers. So it is up to the employer to keep a look out for
signs of this behavior.
First, every company needs
to make sure they have a specific and strategic plan in place to ensure
civility is a part of the corporate culture. It all starts with the type of
employees that you hire. Make sure you are screening for personality and/or
conflict management styles.
Then, bring your team
together for training on cooperation, role modeling and leadership. When teams
are seasoned on these traits, they are often more willing to work in
collaboration and are less likely to use uncivil behavior.
Incivility is a rising
problem in corporate America
with some disastrous side effects, but with just a few corrective steps you can
stem the tide at your company. For more information, contact Todd Weyandt at todd@laihr.com.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Are You Violating the NLRA with Your Social Media Policy and Don't Even Know It?
Most employers are unaware
of the movement from the NLRB (National Labor Relations Board) against
employers’ social media policies. Over the past couple years, the NLRB has become
increasing active in the social media policy debate and has made several
rulings against overly broad corporate social media policies. They are now
monitoring not only the substance of the policy but the actions employers are
taking. Employers are deemed in violation of the NLRA (National Labor Relations
Act) if they prohibit an employee’s ‘concerted activity’ or discipline an
employee for this.
The big question facing
employers is what constitutes ‘concerted activities’? The NLRB has determined
‘concerted activities’ involve active, online conversations among multiple
employees regarding work conditions. Also, the NLRB has struck down many
anti-blogging and disruptive behavior employment policies for being overly
broad prohibitions of protected activity.
The cases in which the
NLRB sided with the employees have some common components. The first being they
all involved employees who criticized very specific employment practices and/or
work conditions. Secondly, these employees conducted conversations online,
after work hours, on personal equipment, with personal accounts and off work
property. Thirdly, and what appears to be most important to the NLRB, is all
the cases involved multiple employees in the online discussions.
Though the NLRB has not
released a guide for employers to use when drafting and enforcing their social
media policies or disciplining employees, there are some precautions every
employer can and should be taking.
1) Create
a Specific Social Media Policy
2) Address
Unique Practices and Concerns of Your Individual Business
3) Avoid
Writing Catch-All Policies
4) Be
Aware of Your Employees’ Social Media Presence
5) Fully
Investigate Every Situation Before Disciplining Employees
6) Review
Your Policies Periodically
For more information on
this topic, sign up for Lowden & Associates’ FREE Social Media Policy
Webinar on June 27, 2012 at 2pm. Register here.
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Legislative Update: NLRB Election Rule Change, Effective April 30, 2012
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has issued a new rule that will expedite union elections in the workplace. This new rule cleared a federal judge’s injunction this past weekend and therefore has gone into effect, April 30, 2012.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has filed suit against the new rule. It is believed a formal ruling on the rule will be delivered before May 15, so no elections will have time to take place beforehand.
Under this new rule designed to reduce the unnecessary litigation, the election process for determining unions will be drastically shorter and more streamlined. Most eligibility reviews will take place after the election instead of before, like the past.
Also, this new rule gives more power to the NLRB Regional Directors and Hearing Officers who can speed up the process as well. Conceivably, under the new NLRB rule, an election process that use to take no less than six weeks could be finished in three weeks.
Unions will now have a substantial voting advantage over the employers. Employees will have to vote in a state of confusion and at the height of their ill feelings. Already, unions had a 70 percent success rate under the old rules and this percentage is likely to increase..
There are five ways to help prepare your company and no time to waste.
1) Review any and all current employee relation programs. Then make improvements so your employees are more engaged and happy.
2) Devise an effective and robust communication system to meet your employees in the channels they like (in-person, brochure, email, social media, etc.).
3) Reduce perceptions of unfairness and/or bias and show how much you care about your employees by they way they are managed.
4) Properly and continuously train your frontline managers on all the important changes, rules, best practices, etc.
5) Be on guard and prepared with a detailed proactive plan and message.
For more information, contact 770.248.0401.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has filed suit against the new rule. It is believed a formal ruling on the rule will be delivered before May 15, so no elections will have time to take place beforehand.
Under this new rule designed to reduce the unnecessary litigation, the election process for determining unions will be drastically shorter and more streamlined. Most eligibility reviews will take place after the election instead of before, like the past.
Also, this new rule gives more power to the NLRB Regional Directors and Hearing Officers who can speed up the process as well. Conceivably, under the new NLRB rule, an election process that use to take no less than six weeks could be finished in three weeks.
Unions will now have a substantial voting advantage over the employers. Employees will have to vote in a state of confusion and at the height of their ill feelings. Already, unions had a 70 percent success rate under the old rules and this percentage is likely to increase..
There are five ways to help prepare your company and no time to waste.
1) Review any and all current employee relation programs. Then make improvements so your employees are more engaged and happy.
2) Devise an effective and robust communication system to meet your employees in the channels they like (in-person, brochure, email, social media, etc.).
3) Reduce perceptions of unfairness and/or bias and show how much you care about your employees by they way they are managed.
4) Properly and continuously train your frontline managers on all the important changes, rules, best practices, etc.
5) Be on guard and prepared with a detailed proactive plan and message.
For more information, contact 770.248.0401.
Friday, April 27, 2012
Top 20 Benefits of HR Outsourcing
20) Two million employers in the United States outsource their Human Resource functions to a Professional Employer Organization (PEO).
19) Over a third of employers have external HR Solutions to gain access to world class capabilities and resources they do not have internally.
18) The average median cost to administer HR internally for companies with less than 250 employees is $1,469 per employee per year.
17) Ability to follow a proven path to better employee productivity and engagement.
16) Gain access to accredited management training programs.
15) Third party intervention available for sensitive disciplinary actions.
14) Have HR experts on the more than 40,000 pages of federal employment regulations plus thousands more of state and local regulations.
13) 150,000 lawsuits related to the workplace are currently pending in court against U.S. businesses due to lack of proper Human Resources.
12) The employee prevails in 60% to 70% of all cases that go to trail because of a lack of proper internal HR documentation.
11) The average amount of damages awarded to workers who sue their employers is $650,000, in addition to the average litigation costs of $75,000.
10) Have seasoned professionals guiding you out of the liability minefields of federal and state employment regulations.
9) LAI keeps clients out of trouble and law suits by being proactive and insuring compliance at all levels.
8) Rely on a deep pool of HR expertise totaling almost 100 years of Human Resource experience.
7) Streamline and simplify your Human Resource operations by consolidating many services into one point of contact.
6) Allows you to focus on growing your core business and let us handle your non-core Human Resource fundamentals.
5) Join the 25% plus employers who say they saved money by having an expert manage these administrative aspects of their business.
4) 60% to 80% of an employer’s time is spent on non-productive administration which means a loss of profits and neglecting vital strategic Human Resource opportunities.
3) Gain an entire team supporting your HR needs instead of one or two in-house HR personnel while having access to current best practices.
2) Employees do not have to wait until the in-house contact is available because an entire team will always be ready to help. This makes your team more efficient and productive.
1) Save money while gaining more knowledge and services to compete more effectively in the marketplace.
19) Over a third of employers have external HR Solutions to gain access to world class capabilities and resources they do not have internally.
18) The average median cost to administer HR internally for companies with less than 250 employees is $1,469 per employee per year.
17) Ability to follow a proven path to better employee productivity and engagement.
16) Gain access to accredited management training programs.
15) Third party intervention available for sensitive disciplinary actions.
14) Have HR experts on the more than 40,000 pages of federal employment regulations plus thousands more of state and local regulations.
13) 150,000 lawsuits related to the workplace are currently pending in court against U.S. businesses due to lack of proper Human Resources.
12) The employee prevails in 60% to 70% of all cases that go to trail because of a lack of proper internal HR documentation.
11) The average amount of damages awarded to workers who sue their employers is $650,000, in addition to the average litigation costs of $75,000.
10) Have seasoned professionals guiding you out of the liability minefields of federal and state employment regulations.
9) LAI keeps clients out of trouble and law suits by being proactive and insuring compliance at all levels.
8) Rely on a deep pool of HR expertise totaling almost 100 years of Human Resource experience.
7) Streamline and simplify your Human Resource operations by consolidating many services into one point of contact.
6) Allows you to focus on growing your core business and let us handle your non-core Human Resource fundamentals.
5) Join the 25% plus employers who say they saved money by having an expert manage these administrative aspects of their business.
4) 60% to 80% of an employer’s time is spent on non-productive administration which means a loss of profits and neglecting vital strategic Human Resource opportunities.
3) Gain an entire team supporting your HR needs instead of one or two in-house HR personnel while having access to current best practices.
2) Employees do not have to wait until the in-house contact is available because an entire team will always be ready to help. This makes your team more efficient and productive.
1) Save money while gaining more knowledge and services to compete more effectively in the marketplace.
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Recruiting Traps in Social Media
Social Media has become one of the top avenues for companies in their recruiting efforts. The Society for Human Resource Management found that 76 percent of companies used social media sites for recruiting in 2011 and more than half believe that social media is an effective way to recruit candidates.
However, with all the possibilities of social media comes an expansive minefield that can be set off with a wrong step. The problems begin to occur when companies go from sourcing candidates to using social media sites to screen or eliminate candidates based on the information found.
There are three main legal categories to warrant potential disputes.
1) Discrimination. Most people are well aware of the dangers of discrimination and make very conscious efforts to avoid any possible discriminatory practices. However, if you screen a candidate by visiting their social media accounts, you open yourself up to the possibility of receiving large amounts of protected information. Social media sites usually disclose vast amounts of information about a person from their race, gender, age, marital status, religion, politics, disability, etc.
2) Fair Credit and Reporting Act Regulations. The FCRA provides specific details about requirements of employers and consumer reporting agencies for the screening process. Employers must follow all of these rules very carefully. First and foremost, they must receive permission from the applicant before any pre-employment check. Also, there are specific rules if any information found leads to an adverse hiring decision. Documentation must be kept accurately. The nature of social media makes this difficult to comply because the content is published and controlled by the consumers and can change at any time.
3) Negligent Hiring. It is possible that, if a violent workplace situation occurred in which derogatory information was public on the perpetrator’s social media profiles that could have shown the bad behavior, the employer might become liable for negligence since they did not use the information when the hiring decision was made.
So how can a company reduce these risks? It boils down to three categories you could fall into:
- Deny access to social media for all recruiting purposes
- Only use social media for sourcing candidates
- Use social media throughout the hiring process and create policies and procedures to avoid the dangers.
For more information on how to avoid the traps in recruiting on social media, call 770.248.0401 or email Todd Weyandt at todd@laihr.com.
However, with all the possibilities of social media comes an expansive minefield that can be set off with a wrong step. The problems begin to occur when companies go from sourcing candidates to using social media sites to screen or eliminate candidates based on the information found.
There are three main legal categories to warrant potential disputes.
1) Discrimination. Most people are well aware of the dangers of discrimination and make very conscious efforts to avoid any possible discriminatory practices. However, if you screen a candidate by visiting their social media accounts, you open yourself up to the possibility of receiving large amounts of protected information. Social media sites usually disclose vast amounts of information about a person from their race, gender, age, marital status, religion, politics, disability, etc.
2) Fair Credit and Reporting Act Regulations. The FCRA provides specific details about requirements of employers and consumer reporting agencies for the screening process. Employers must follow all of these rules very carefully. First and foremost, they must receive permission from the applicant before any pre-employment check. Also, there are specific rules if any information found leads to an adverse hiring decision. Documentation must be kept accurately. The nature of social media makes this difficult to comply because the content is published and controlled by the consumers and can change at any time.
3) Negligent Hiring. It is possible that, if a violent workplace situation occurred in which derogatory information was public on the perpetrator’s social media profiles that could have shown the bad behavior, the employer might become liable for negligence since they did not use the information when the hiring decision was made.
So how can a company reduce these risks? It boils down to three categories you could fall into:
- Deny access to social media for all recruiting purposes
- Only use social media for sourcing candidates
- Use social media throughout the hiring process and create policies and procedures to avoid the dangers.
For more information on how to avoid the traps in recruiting on social media, call 770.248.0401 or email Todd Weyandt at todd@laihr.com.
Who Owns Your Twitter Account?
Who owns content published on social media sites?
Now, before you answer the question it is not as cut and dry as you may think. In fact, nobody is 100 percent sure of the answer. There are few laws and decided court cases that can help reach a definitive answer. In the meantime, the amount of lawsuits being filed is increasing as employers and former employees fight over Twitter handles and followers.
When looking at Twitter ownership, the function of the site is crucial. What is the primarily reason for the site? Is it to share personal information and occasionally pass along a company article? Or, is it to drive up sales, marketing, branding, etc. for a company? If the site is decidedly for business, the company has a much stronger claim on ownership.
However, a recent example does cast a shadow over the ownership dispute. In September of 2011, a company called PhoneDog Media filed a suit against their former editor-in-chief Noah Kravitz claiming that he unlawfully changed his Twitter handle (name) from @PhoneDog_Noah to @noahkravitz when he left the company. In their claim, PhoneDog said Kravitz owned $340,000 for all of the followers associated with the account ($2.50 for each of the 17,000 followers when he left per month for 8 months).
The question being bounced around in the courts is does PhoneDog have a claim to that Twitter account when Kravitz created and maintained the handle entirely by himself?
To reduce the risks of a messy legal battle like PhoneDog–v–Kravitz, companies need to make their social media policies very clear about their intentions of who owns the content and followers from the beginning. A best practice is to enter into separate agreements with those employees who have Twitter handles and followers that the company claims to own, making sure everybody is on the same page. Leave nothing to assumption or ambiguity in your social media policies.
Now, before you answer the question it is not as cut and dry as you may think. In fact, nobody is 100 percent sure of the answer. There are few laws and decided court cases that can help reach a definitive answer. In the meantime, the amount of lawsuits being filed is increasing as employers and former employees fight over Twitter handles and followers.
When looking at Twitter ownership, the function of the site is crucial. What is the primarily reason for the site? Is it to share personal information and occasionally pass along a company article? Or, is it to drive up sales, marketing, branding, etc. for a company? If the site is decidedly for business, the company has a much stronger claim on ownership.
However, a recent example does cast a shadow over the ownership dispute. In September of 2011, a company called PhoneDog Media filed a suit against their former editor-in-chief Noah Kravitz claiming that he unlawfully changed his Twitter handle (name) from @PhoneDog_Noah to @noahkravitz when he left the company. In their claim, PhoneDog said Kravitz owned $340,000 for all of the followers associated with the account ($2.50 for each of the 17,000 followers when he left per month for 8 months).
The question being bounced around in the courts is does PhoneDog have a claim to that Twitter account when Kravitz created and maintained the handle entirely by himself?
To reduce the risks of a messy legal battle like PhoneDog–v–Kravitz, companies need to make their social media policies very clear about their intentions of who owns the content and followers from the beginning. A best practice is to enter into separate agreements with those employees who have Twitter handles and followers that the company claims to own, making sure everybody is on the same page. Leave nothing to assumption or ambiguity in your social media policies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















