20) Two million employers in the United States outsource their Human Resource functions to a Professional Employer Organization (PEO).
19) Over a third of employers have external HR Solutions to gain access to world class capabilities and resources they do not have internally.
18) The average median cost to administer HR internally for companies with less than 250 employees is $1,469 per employee per year.
17) Ability to follow a proven path to better employee productivity and engagement.
16) Gain access to accredited management training programs.
15) Third party intervention available for sensitive disciplinary actions.
14) Have HR experts on the more than 40,000 pages of federal employment regulations plus thousands more of state and local regulations.
13) 150,000 lawsuits related to the workplace are currently pending in court against U.S. businesses due to lack of proper Human Resources.
12) The employee prevails in 60% to 70% of all cases that go to trail because of a lack of proper internal HR documentation.
11) The average amount of damages awarded to workers who sue their employers is $650,000, in addition to the average litigation costs of $75,000.
10) Have seasoned professionals guiding you out of the liability minefields of federal and state employment regulations.
9) LAI keeps clients out of trouble and law suits by being proactive and insuring compliance at all levels.
8) Rely on a deep pool of HR expertise totaling almost 100 years of Human Resource experience.
7) Streamline and simplify your Human Resource operations by consolidating many services into one point of contact.
6) Allows you to focus on growing your core business and let us handle your non-core Human Resource fundamentals.
5) Join the 25% plus employers who say they saved money by having an expert manage these administrative aspects of their business.
4) 60% to 80% of an employer’s time is spent on non-productive administration which means a loss of profits and neglecting vital strategic Human Resource opportunities.
3) Gain an entire team supporting your HR needs instead of one or two in-house HR personnel while having access to current best practices.
2) Employees do not have to wait until the in-house contact is available because an entire team will always be ready to help. This makes your team more efficient and productive.
1) Save money while gaining more knowledge and services to compete more effectively in the marketplace.
Friday, April 27, 2012
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Recruiting Traps in Social Media
Social Media has become one of the top avenues for companies in their recruiting efforts. The Society for Human Resource Management found that 76 percent of companies used social media sites for recruiting in 2011 and more than half believe that social media is an effective way to recruit candidates.
However, with all the possibilities of social media comes an expansive minefield that can be set off with a wrong step. The problems begin to occur when companies go from sourcing candidates to using social media sites to screen or eliminate candidates based on the information found.
There are three main legal categories to warrant potential disputes.
1) Discrimination. Most people are well aware of the dangers of discrimination and make very conscious efforts to avoid any possible discriminatory practices. However, if you screen a candidate by visiting their social media accounts, you open yourself up to the possibility of receiving large amounts of protected information. Social media sites usually disclose vast amounts of information about a person from their race, gender, age, marital status, religion, politics, disability, etc.
2) Fair Credit and Reporting Act Regulations. The FCRA provides specific details about requirements of employers and consumer reporting agencies for the screening process. Employers must follow all of these rules very carefully. First and foremost, they must receive permission from the applicant before any pre-employment check. Also, there are specific rules if any information found leads to an adverse hiring decision. Documentation must be kept accurately. The nature of social media makes this difficult to comply because the content is published and controlled by the consumers and can change at any time.
3) Negligent Hiring. It is possible that, if a violent workplace situation occurred in which derogatory information was public on the perpetrator’s social media profiles that could have shown the bad behavior, the employer might become liable for negligence since they did not use the information when the hiring decision was made.
So how can a company reduce these risks? It boils down to three categories you could fall into:
- Deny access to social media for all recruiting purposes
- Only use social media for sourcing candidates
- Use social media throughout the hiring process and create policies and procedures to avoid the dangers.
For more information on how to avoid the traps in recruiting on social media, call 770.248.0401 or email Todd Weyandt at todd@laihr.com.
However, with all the possibilities of social media comes an expansive minefield that can be set off with a wrong step. The problems begin to occur when companies go from sourcing candidates to using social media sites to screen or eliminate candidates based on the information found.
There are three main legal categories to warrant potential disputes.
1) Discrimination. Most people are well aware of the dangers of discrimination and make very conscious efforts to avoid any possible discriminatory practices. However, if you screen a candidate by visiting their social media accounts, you open yourself up to the possibility of receiving large amounts of protected information. Social media sites usually disclose vast amounts of information about a person from their race, gender, age, marital status, religion, politics, disability, etc.
2) Fair Credit and Reporting Act Regulations. The FCRA provides specific details about requirements of employers and consumer reporting agencies for the screening process. Employers must follow all of these rules very carefully. First and foremost, they must receive permission from the applicant before any pre-employment check. Also, there are specific rules if any information found leads to an adverse hiring decision. Documentation must be kept accurately. The nature of social media makes this difficult to comply because the content is published and controlled by the consumers and can change at any time.
3) Negligent Hiring. It is possible that, if a violent workplace situation occurred in which derogatory information was public on the perpetrator’s social media profiles that could have shown the bad behavior, the employer might become liable for negligence since they did not use the information when the hiring decision was made.
So how can a company reduce these risks? It boils down to three categories you could fall into:
- Deny access to social media for all recruiting purposes
- Only use social media for sourcing candidates
- Use social media throughout the hiring process and create policies and procedures to avoid the dangers.
For more information on how to avoid the traps in recruiting on social media, call 770.248.0401 or email Todd Weyandt at todd@laihr.com.
Who Owns Your Twitter Account?
Who owns content published on social media sites?
Now, before you answer the question it is not as cut and dry as you may think. In fact, nobody is 100 percent sure of the answer. There are few laws and decided court cases that can help reach a definitive answer. In the meantime, the amount of lawsuits being filed is increasing as employers and former employees fight over Twitter handles and followers.
When looking at Twitter ownership, the function of the site is crucial. What is the primarily reason for the site? Is it to share personal information and occasionally pass along a company article? Or, is it to drive up sales, marketing, branding, etc. for a company? If the site is decidedly for business, the company has a much stronger claim on ownership.
However, a recent example does cast a shadow over the ownership dispute. In September of 2011, a company called PhoneDog Media filed a suit against their former editor-in-chief Noah Kravitz claiming that he unlawfully changed his Twitter handle (name) from @PhoneDog_Noah to @noahkravitz when he left the company. In their claim, PhoneDog said Kravitz owned $340,000 for all of the followers associated with the account ($2.50 for each of the 17,000 followers when he left per month for 8 months).
The question being bounced around in the courts is does PhoneDog have a claim to that Twitter account when Kravitz created and maintained the handle entirely by himself?
To reduce the risks of a messy legal battle like PhoneDog–v–Kravitz, companies need to make their social media policies very clear about their intentions of who owns the content and followers from the beginning. A best practice is to enter into separate agreements with those employees who have Twitter handles and followers that the company claims to own, making sure everybody is on the same page. Leave nothing to assumption or ambiguity in your social media policies.
Now, before you answer the question it is not as cut and dry as you may think. In fact, nobody is 100 percent sure of the answer. There are few laws and decided court cases that can help reach a definitive answer. In the meantime, the amount of lawsuits being filed is increasing as employers and former employees fight over Twitter handles and followers.
When looking at Twitter ownership, the function of the site is crucial. What is the primarily reason for the site? Is it to share personal information and occasionally pass along a company article? Or, is it to drive up sales, marketing, branding, etc. for a company? If the site is decidedly for business, the company has a much stronger claim on ownership.
However, a recent example does cast a shadow over the ownership dispute. In September of 2011, a company called PhoneDog Media filed a suit against their former editor-in-chief Noah Kravitz claiming that he unlawfully changed his Twitter handle (name) from @PhoneDog_Noah to @noahkravitz when he left the company. In their claim, PhoneDog said Kravitz owned $340,000 for all of the followers associated with the account ($2.50 for each of the 17,000 followers when he left per month for 8 months).
The question being bounced around in the courts is does PhoneDog have a claim to that Twitter account when Kravitz created and maintained the handle entirely by himself?
To reduce the risks of a messy legal battle like PhoneDog–v–Kravitz, companies need to make their social media policies very clear about their intentions of who owns the content and followers from the beginning. A best practice is to enter into separate agreements with those employees who have Twitter handles and followers that the company claims to own, making sure everybody is on the same page. Leave nothing to assumption or ambiguity in your social media policies.
Friday, March 30, 2012
Do Your Employees Trust You?
5 Steps to Earn Your Employees Trust and RespectMost managers would say their employees trust and respect them, but the question becomes is that reality? Managers are at a disadvantage when trying to answer this question. Only they know the intentions behind various actions. Meanwhile, their employees must judge a manager by how they perceive the managers behavior and style.
So how can a manager show employees their good intentions to earn their trust? There are five things even good manager must do:
1) Managers Must Have Consistent Follow Through. Employees want to know what to expect from their boss in different situations. When a manager is inconsistent in reactions, employees feel the need to be constantly protecting themselves in playing defense. This may sound like an easy concept, but can take an enormous amount of discipline for some managers.
2) Communicate Through Clear and Open Lines. Employees do not like when they feel a boss is keeping important information from them. In fact, this can demoralize some employees and leads them into a state of permanent second guessing. Your employees do not want to feel like you are spinning a message in order to make yourself and/or the company look better.
3) Even Managers Need Work. Never think that there is nothing you need to learn and/or improve because there is. Employees who see their managers trying to improve their skills will be more likely to improve theirs.
4) Your Values Should Not Be Shaded In Gray. Managers must make their values and priorities as clear as possible so employees have a guideline. Also, you need to consistently state your values.
5) Support Your Team When Necessary. Employees do not trust managers who routinely ‘throw them under the bus’ when it becomes inconvenient for them. Stand up for your staff in defense whenever possible. Few things will garner the amount of trust and respect of a manager as when they support their staff through the difficult times.
Being a trustworthy manager is one of the first steps in creating an engaged and productive workforce for your company. It all starts with your leadership!
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Lowden & Associates, Inc. Certified as a Woman Business Enterprise
“Certification provides a marketing opportunity for women business enterprises to participate in outreach programs,” says Sheila Lowden Dramis, Owner and CEO of Lowden & Associates, Inc. “In addition, this program will enable us to develop relationships with larger companies and create opportunities for future partnerships with them and public and private companies.”
“NWBOC seeks to increase the ability of women business owners to compete for corporate and government contracts,” says Janet Harris-Lange, President of NWBOC. “At the same time, NWBOC also hopes to decrease the number of front operations participating in corporate and government outreach programs.”
NWBOC, a national 501(c)3 not-for-profit corporation, was created in response to needs identified by the Procurement Special Interest Group of the National Association of Women Business Owners. The study revealed that the public and private sector had not received nor recognized the benefits of contracting with women suppliers. This has prevented purchasers from obtaining the best value in their procurement and it has limited women business owners from penetrating these markets, which has stymied their growth. NWBOC seeks to provide more corporations with the opportunity to better their procurement practices and to women suppliers the opportunity to compete.
Lowden & Associates, Inc. (LAI) is a full service human resource outsourcing and consulting firm that helps companies reclaim time, save money and stay compliant with government regulations. LAI is headquartered in Norcross, Georgia, established in 1998. It has a strong commitment to personalized customer service and a portfolio of services that cover the four major areas of employee management: compliance, benefits, worker’s compensation and payroll. The website is www.laihr.com and phone number is 770-248-0401.
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Compliance Changes and Effectiveness
Employers are faced with many "to-do" list items each and every day making it almost impossible without support to know all the laws needed to be accomplished. Something usually gets pushed to the back burner in the process. Don't let the compliance side of your business slip through the cracks because it can cost you dearly in the long run.
Below is a list of upcoming effective dates on new laws, posters, regulations, etc.
Effective Date....New Regulation/Poster/etc (Category)
4/3/2012..........GINA Record Keeping Rule (Employee Relations)
4/3/2012..........Union Election Rule (Labor Relations)
4/30/2012.........Employee Rights Poster (Employee Relations)
7/1 & 8/30/2012...Fee Disclosure Final Rule/Deadlines (Benefits)
9/23/2012.........Summary of Benefits/Coverage Final Rule (Benefits)
For more information on any of the aforementioned, contact Todd Weyandt at todd@laihr.com or 770.248.0401.
Below is a list of upcoming effective dates on new laws, posters, regulations, etc.
Effective Date....New Regulation/Poster/etc (Category)
4/3/2012..........GINA Record Keeping Rule (Employee Relations)
4/3/2012..........Union Election Rule (Labor Relations)
4/30/2012.........Employee Rights Poster (Employee Relations)
7/1 & 8/30/2012...Fee Disclosure Final Rule/Deadlines (Benefits)
9/23/2012.........Summary of Benefits/Coverage Final Rule (Benefits)
For more information on any of the aforementioned, contact Todd Weyandt at todd@laihr.com or 770.248.0401.
FREE Webinar on Managing Risks
The risk level that is being piled on small business is constantly increasing with each passing year! With more and more federal and state regulations being passed down all the time, how is your company dealing with the ever looming threats of penalties, fines and lawsuits?Join Lowden & Associates, Inc. for a FREE webinar on how to manage the risks small businesses are being forced to take.
Featured Highlights:
- Compliance Overview with Damages and Penalties
- The Do’s and Don’ts of Policies and Procedures
- Quality Interview and Selection Process
- How to Handle Employee Problems, Harassment, Discipline and Terminations
- Importance of Training and Education
- Advantages of an Outsourced Solution
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
OR
Thursday, March 29, 2012
1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
RESERVE YOUR FREE SPACE TODAY!
Contact Todd Weyandt
todd@laihr.com
770.248.0401 ext. 20
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


